8

Global Warming – Carbon Disproved

We have two easy ways to disprove the central claim of global warming alarmists, who claim that there is a very strong correlation between CO2 and global temperature, and that CO2 has thus been the cause of the recent warming, and that the warming will thus begin increasing at an alarming degree starting in the year 2000.

Proof #1 – No correlation over 600 million years

As we can see in this 600 million year time line, there is no correlation between temperature and CO2. Also, we can see that the earth has usually been 18° F warmer than it is now, and that it has rarely been this cold and hasn’t been colder.

Proof #2 – Perfect correlation with solar activity

In 2015, someone finally got around to publishing a professional peer reviewed study correlating temperature with solar activity since 1880, and we see that temperature correlates perfectly with solar activity.

image_thumb4_thumb1

The Tragedy of the Minimum Wage

An increasing percentage of adults of average intelligence are making at or near the minimum wage, which is a tragedy from any perspective, and thus a popular solution today is to double the minimum wage.

Bernie Sanders is the Presidential candidate promising to double the minimum wage. He says it’s because he really cares about people, and because people have a right to a living wage, and because it would strengthen the economy by enlarging the middle class, which would thus increase consumer spending.

Imagine if Bernie Sanders won and implemented his ideas. Then, if a 30 year old man had been making minimum wage and it were suddenly doubled, he could afford to marry a woman who was making minimum wage, and they could afford to have kids.

That example sounds pretty good if we stop thinking at this point, but if we think for ourselves …

It is pretty easy to see that:

  • Bernie Sanders’ positions on economics are nearly identical to those expoused by Barack Obama throughout his entire life, and yet, after Obama has been President for more than 7 years, an ever increasing percentage of adult Americans are doing jobs that pay at or near the minimum wage in most cities. Therefore, Bernie Sanders’ policies as President would be likely to increase the percentage of Americans making at or near minimum wage, and the people who were fooled by Obama are likely to be fooled by Bernie Sanders.
  • The labor of a burger flipper at McDonalds is worth far less than the labor of a doctor, scientist, engineer, or programmer.
  • It is a disgrace for any average man born in America to be flipping burgers at McDonalds … for ANY wage … because it is such a waste of his potential, and thus it would be an atrocity for government or anyone else to pay him to waste his potential, thereby trapping him in such a job.
  • A higher minimum wage would force up prices and wages until eventually inflation will have caused a doubled minimum wage to only buy the same amount of stuff as before.
  • A higher cost of labor would force companies to lay off many workers.
  • A higher cost of labor for simple jobs would make it more cost effective for companies to replace those jobs with automation (software and robotics).
  • Such a sudden increase would cause people to tragically make unsustainable life choices because they would assume that they would remain employed and continue to have twice the buying power as before, but future layoffs and inflation, caused in large part by doubling the minimum wage, would pull the rug out from under them after they had over extended themselves, which would be another atrocity in addition to paying them to waste their potential.
  • By trapping adults in dead end jobs that waste their potential, a doubling of the minimum wage would thus be an atrocity tantamount to the atrocity of perpetrating government dependency on the black community.

For many, allegory will be more clear than abstract reasoning, so let’s consider how the future would unfold for one man, Chris, if Bernie Sanders won the 2016 Presidential election and promptly doubled the minimum wage.

The Life of Chris

Chris graduated from college with a liberal arts degree in 2009, so he had voted for Obama of course, and even though he had been making minimum wage since the beginning of the Obama administration, he voted to reelect Obama because he still believed the media, who were still telling him that Obama was going to fix everything. He still believed the Myth of Obama created by the media.

Chris was flipping burgers at McDonald’s and thus was contributing pretty much nothing to the world, and for this reason, the world was contributing pretty much nothing to Chris.

Since graduation in 2009, Chris had dreamed of making enough money that he could get married and support a family so that his wife could stay at home and raise the kids so they wouldn’t turn out to be little sociopaths. He had seen how well this had worked for his parents and his brother, which is why he wanted to emulate this aspect of his heritage, even though he saw his family as “not smart enough to vote for Obama”. At some level, he also understood that he had also avoided the trap of drug use because of his parents and his brother.

However, by 2016 Chris had declared bankruptcy. He was at the lowest point in his life and had pretty much given up on Obama. He was ready to make the effort to become a computer programmer, like his brother, which he accurately concluded anyone of average intelligence (like his brother) could do at any point in life if he were willing to make the effort.

According to standardized tests, Chris was actually slightly less intelligent than his brother, and thus both were considered average by what Chris called “conservative” testing methods. Whereas, Chris felt with deep conviction that he was actually smarter than his brother because he was more liberal and because all of his friends agreed with him. He could go all day every day and not meet anyone else in Seattle who disagreed with him. He also believed with deep conviction that he was not “misinformed by the media” like his brother because he did not even own a TV.

Therefore, in 2016, Chris, and all of his friends, voted for Bernie Sanders. They refused to vote for Hillary Clinton. They would not be fooled again like they were with Obama who they were beginning to feel must have actually been “some kind of Neocon”.

Although Bernie Sanders won, Chris didn’t know that, like Obama, Bernie Sanders had won in all the states that used electronic voting machines. Also like Obama, Bernie won in some precincts with more than 100%.

Bernie’s election had once again filled Chris with the hope that he had slowly lost throughout the Obama administration. Then, a few weeks after Chris had begun studying computer programming, Bernie Sanders doubled the minimum wage by executive order. He did this in his first week in office and thus suddenly affirmed everything Chris and his friends believed.

Chris was thinking that computer programming was harder than it actually was because he was still a few weeks away from developing the necessary personal discipline. Chris thus decided that it would be very liberating to free himself from the difficulty of becoming a programmer at this time. He could always do it later.

Chris was flipping burgers at McDonalds and was thus contributing pretty much nothing to the world. However, the world was now forced to contribute twice as much to Chris. Somehow it all seemed fair and just to Chris and his friends, and they knew that it was all because Bernie really cared about people, and because they were smart enough to vote for Bernie.

Out of convenience, Chris married a woman who also made the newly doubled minimum wage. Although they did not make as much combined as his brother, they could buy cheap stuff from China and could thus afford to raise a family with the help of free day care from the government. Of course, their kids were raised by daycare and TV, and were thus little sociopaths compared to his brother’s kids.

Chris’ potential, and the potential of his wife, and many of his friends continued to be wasted … but it gets much worse …

The higher cost of labor then forced many companies to permanently layoff an ever increasing number of minimum wage workers because it was more cost effective to automate the labor of those minimum wage workers. Of course, that caused many new jobs to be created around the world in corresponding skills, such as computer programming. His one libertarian friend, Jim, called it creative destruction, which is why Chris believed with deep conviction that libertarians were stupid people who didn’t care about anyone – except for Jim.

The higher cost of labor also caused inflation, which eroded the extra buying power of the higher minimum wage, so Chris and his wife made twice as much money, but after ten years, everything cost twice as much. By then, he was 40 and becoming a computer programmer was harder, so he postponed it again.

In addition to the damage of inflation, Chris could no longer afford to buy things made in China because Bernie Sanders had imposed a tariff on Chinese products. Bernie claimed that cheaper labor in China was causing American jobs to go overseas. Bernie didn’t know that his higher taxes and heavy regulations were retarding American job growth and innovation. He didn’t know that such policies were a large part of why so many Americans were in minimum wage jobs in the first place. He did not know that freedom is what creates a middle class.

The Chinese government had learned from what once made America great, so they did not reward mediocrity and they did increase freedom. As a result, their people and businesses were thus forced to grow and excel and innovate, which anyone can do, if they must, and thus, products made in China became more expensive and of higher quality than products made in America.

Then Chris’ wife, who had escaped so many previous layoffs, got permanently laid off herself … and commited suicide …

Of his three little sociopaths, one ended up in prison and one died of an overdose, but before further tragedy could strike, the next president (another Democrat) started a war with China because Democrats believe that WWII was good for the economy. Then, like in WWII, all basic necessities were rationed so they could be redirected toward the war effort. Instead of cars and washing machines, people made tanks and bombs, and thus his wife could have gotten a job in a government factory …

His remaining son was drafted of course, but at least he had a job … except … then his son died in battle … and Chris commited suicide … and it was all because Bernie Sanders cared so much about people …

Chris’s friend Jim observed that hundreds of millions around the world died, and that it was those who were most dependent on government. Jim also observed that, perhaps not so coincidentally, this was also the goal of eugenics, which has always been a goal of progressives, and which is thus a goal of the New World Order.

Jim observed that it was almost as if Bernie Sanders were a useful idiot for the NWO.

Then Jim learned that the Federal Reserve was also a large cause of America’s economic problems and that Bernie Sanders had sold out Ron Paul’s “Audit the Fed” bill by introducing an amendment that neutered it.

Perhaps Bernie was not being played by the NWO at all. Perhaps Bernie was one of the players.

Trump is a Ringer. Hillary is Trump’s Bitch.

Trump could easily run as an independent and cause the Republican to lose, or if he won the nomination, then he could easily throw the election so that Hillary would win. After all, he has been friends with the Clintons for years, and it wouldn’t be the first time a billionaire ran as an independent to ensure a Clinton victory. Why would Trump want to be conservative or libertarian now when he was always more of a Democrat before?

As an independent candidate, Trump could plausibly claim he was simply mad at the Republicans for not treating him fairly. As the Republican candidate, he could plausibly lose by frequently rehashing only 1% of Hillary’s vulnerabilities – just like how every Republican before him has done.

We know we are being played, but we don’t know exactly how yet, and I have been saying from the beginning that the most likely scenario of the many possibilities is that Trump is in the race to ensure a Hillary victory.

A few months ago, Trump’s advisor, Roger Stone, went on a tour for his devastating and popular new book, “The Clinton’s War on Women.” No one who reads it could vote for Hillary, but is that Trump trying to win, or is that Trump playing Hillary because she would then know she could only win on Trump’s terms.

Perhaps the most incriminating evidence of all is that Trump wouldn’t like doing the job of the President; whereas, Hillary would LOVE doing the job, and thus Trump could be doing what he likes most while knowing the President of the United states was his bitch.

I missed the previous opportunity for such a prediction. Two days before Scalia’s murder, I was thinking I should write about how if it looked like the next President might not be a Democrat or Neocon (Republican Progressive), then they would try to murder one of the conservative judges before Obama leaves, and how that would most likely be Scalia. Ironically, Scalia’s murder is thus the only evidence that Trump may not be in it to ensure a Hillary victory, although it is more likely they were just too impatient to wait for Scalia to die naturally.

On the other hand, the establishment media are not trying nearly as hard as they could to knock Trump out, so maybe Trump is actually the most favored torch carrier for the establishment. He has certainly been a crony of government – by his own admission – for a long time.

Like I said, we know we are being played, but we just don’t know exactly how – yet.

8

Paul Craig Roberts is a Psyop

PCR, who once worked for Ronald Reagan, writes much truth that is rare or unreported in the establishment media. He sounds like a knowledgeable and experienced former insider who is blowing the whistle on the NWO conspirators in charge. He sounds like a kind of conservative libertarian expert on politics and economics. He sounds like the voice of reason (to the well informed). That is 98% of each of his articles. That is the hook – to gain your confidence, but he never really gets to the bottom of the real causes and solutions – while he subtly slips you his real message.

His most recent work is The US Economy Has Not Recovered And Will Not Recover. In it he says:

“The US economy died when … the financial system was deregulated.”

“… neoconservative hegemony now threaten Social Security and the entirety of the social safety net.”

What?! Is PCR actually Bernie Sanders?!

Doesn’t PCR know that both parties work for the same people?

Doesn’t he know that neocons are Republican progressives?

Doesn’t he know that progressives have been in charge since at least 1913?

Doesn’t he know the 2008 crash, cover up, and ongoing depression were caused by government?

Why does he want us to believe that the soluton to government is … more government? Isn’t that what the NWO also wants us to believe?

Much of what PCR says is truth rarely spoken by the MSM. That is the hook he uses to slip us the poison pill of progressivism.

Paul Craig Roberts is a Psyop.

Scalia’s Murder Leads to Civil War

With Scalia’s murder, the 5-4 majority against civil war is about to flip. (Scalia was murdered, or else there would have been no need for a cover up.)

With Scalia’s murder, Obama’s next appointment to the US Supreme Court will create the first majority of activist judges who would vote to disarm the American people in violation of the Constitution. Such an aggression against the American people would inevitably be the cause of civil war.

Anyone who doubts Obama’s intentions or the meaning of the Constitution should read:

Obama has always wanted our guns.

The Meaning of the US Constitution.

Anyone who doubts the spiritual implicatons should read:

Jesus Confronts an American Believer

In the eternal war of the Soul Of Humanity vs. the Soul of Animals, America is the last stand. Should America lose, the global police state would last for 1000 years until it crumbled from within, but there would be no rebirth. The Soul of Humanity will have been exterminated from the human genome.

Government Develops New Murder Technique

This video shows how the police/FBI are using a new technique that allows them to murder a victim with arms raised. First, they shoot at the victim while he is driving, and then two shots are fired as the victim emerges from his car, which we know from this video. Then the victim, with arms raised, briefly and instinctively reaches for the wound. Then the other agents act quickly enough that they can shoot him to death because they can claim they thought he was going for a gun, which they can do because they are above the law. Can you imagine if the victim shot an agent who touched his side because the victim claimed he thought the agent was going for a gun?!

Given how cops are above the law … and work for the bad guys, they should not be allowed to shoot until their victim has actually drawn a gun and pointed it at them and started shooting.

3

The Real Immigration Problem

Regarding immigration, I would apply the same common sense principle as any other rational person. I would spend my own money to help my allies and any others who would benefit me to have easier access to me, and I would spend my own money to hinder my enemies and any others who would harm me from having easier access to me. If I weren’t sure, then I would observe whether they were being assisted by my enemies, and if so, then I would assume that a majority of them were either my enemies or were being used by my enemies to harm me.

It is indeed the case that my enemies are bringing people across the border, which you should care about very much, because my enemies are your enemies because my principles are in your best interests.

My principles are – everything voluntary. You own yourself and thus the fruits of your labor (your property). You have the right to defend yourself and your property. Decentralization is best because less central power means a greater proportion of the laws are only local laws, and it also means greater diversity in local laws, which means one can just move to a better town if one doesn’t like the local government, which all means local governments will be competing to be the best governments they can be … and that government is best which governs least.

Our enemies are those who want to control us, confiscate the fruits of our labor, reduce our choices, force us to conform, make us dependent, censor us, disarm us, deceive us, play us, or otherwise neutralize us. Such people can be loosely described as progressives, which includes neocons (Republican progressives) and an army of useful idiots.

One of the two main groups of useful idiots are those who think they are fighting against their imaginary enemy – the racists. Ironically, their frivolous accusations of racism prove that it is they who are the racists. This group of useful idiots overlaps the other main group, who think they are fighting the crony billionaires and multinational corporations by demanding more government, more taxes, more spending, more regulation, more centralization, and global government. Of course, they are furthering the agenda of those they think they oppose.

The people whom the progressive elite are helping to come here are a new kind of useful idiot. The progressive elite actually see them as their enemy in the long term, but at the moment, they also see them as useful idiots. In the long term, the progressive elite, who are white/Jewish eugenicists, want to sterilize 99% of the people like those they are helping to come here. Therefore, they obviously think that the people they help to come here are going to help them overcome the last obstacle to their other long term agenda, which is global domination.

The progressive elite believe the last obstacle to their global domination is the armed citizenry of America. Once they have neutralized the American people, then no one will be left to stop them.

The progressive elite expect these particular immigrants to help them remove the last obstacle to their global domination. For example, they expect most immigrants to vote for the Democrats, who are yet another kind of useful idiot because they are pushing hard for the last two planks in the globalist agenda designed to neutralize the American people. One is the total takeover of healthcare, and the other is disarming the people. Additionally they expect these immigrants to be more willing to join the DHS and thus directly help disarm the indigenous American population once the progressive elite are ready.

The progressive elite also expect some of the immigrants to be Islamic jihadists, which will help them strengthen the Patriot Act and perpetrate their “war on terror” against those people on American soil. Then, the transition from fighting Islamic jihadists on American soil to fighting libertarians, Tea Partiers, patriots, and any other critics labeled as domestic terrorists … would be seamless.

Just to be clear, the only ethical policy is – everything voluntary. Therefore, nothing I would do would be an initiation of force; however, force is already justified in response to the countless ways in which our enemies have already initiated force. Nevertheless, do not respond with force just because it is justified. They are playing us. They are desperately trying to provoke the people into attacking the government or each other so that they can have their pretense for a greater police state to combat “domestic terrorists”. Remember, they control the media.

Evil vs. The Vanishing Heap

Does evil exist? Is it an entity, a collective, a force?

– or –

Is evil like a heap …

Suppose I show you a heap of sand, and you agree it is a heap of sand. If I remove one grain, then you would agree that it is still a heap of sand, and if I keep removing a grain of sand until only one remains, then you would agree that it is no longer a heap of sand. You would also agree that there was no magical grain whose removal transformed the heap into a non-heap, and yet, the heap did indeed transform into a non-heap. How is that possible?

A heap is a fuzzy but useful concept. Our language is full of fuzzy but useful concepts like: heap, big, good, right, moral … and evil.

Evil is really just an accusation that means that you have an intense dislike and/or distrust and/or disrespect for the target of your accusation, and that you believe others would agree with you if they knew what you know. In other words, evil is weak threat that is mostly bluff. Its power is mostly dependent on your reputation with your audience.

I prefer to use more precise terms like useful, profitable, objective, falsifiable, or voluntary. Of course, one can often just let the facts speak for themselves.

17

The Flat Earth Psyop

There is a growing conspiracy theory that claims the earth is flat, and it usually goes like this: Aliens or some other higher beings created the earth, which is a flat non-spinning disk, and which is covered by a dome. The north pole is at the center, and Antarctica rings the entire disk. The dome is a screen several thousand miles high on which all objects in space are displayed. Gravity does not exist. The earth is between a few thousand and a few million years old. All photos and evidence to the contrary are fake. Only 500 human insiders are part of the conspiracy.

Now, a scientifically minded person should be willing to consider any new evidence, and many conspiracy theories do turn out to be true, and we do know that governments and powerful people lie about … well … everything. However, after watching a few hours of video, any person of at least average mental abilities should be able to determine that the flat earth theory is both a weak argument and is simply not falsifiable because all evidence to the contrary is simply declared fake. Therefore, no rational person would believe it. Nor would anyone who cared about his reputation make such an extraordinary claim based on such weak evidence. A more scientifically informed person would also be aware that flat earthers do not address most of the evidence that contradicts their theory.

There is some excellent material that refutes the flat earthers, and which is easy to find, so this movement cannot last long.

It would thus be obvious to flat earthers that making such a poor argument for such an extreme position would permanently destroy their credibility on … well … everything, and that they would have little time left to profit from it, so they would do so only if they were getting a pretty large short term reward or a long term promise of some kind from a secret benefactor.

Perhaps the lowest level flat earthers get enough emotional benefit from believing to make it seem worth the cost – like from a religion or other addiction; however, the most prominent flat earthers, who exhibit substantial savvy, are even more likely to know it’s fake, and have even more to lose, and yet are not getting a sufficiently large short term reward …

The only possibility for the most prominent flat earthers is that they have a long term expectation of reward from a secret benefactor. Therefore, they are part of a psyop intended primarily to tarnish real conspiracies while providing the fringe benefits of dividing conspiracy researchers and wasting their time. The psyop even causes people to self-identify as candidates for future eugenics programs.

The most prominent flat earthers also promote real conspiracies, so it is as if they are smearing poo all over their work on real conspiracies. This has been explained to them countless times, and yet, they keep doing it.

One of my favorite aspects of the flat earth psyop is its unintended indictment of government schools. Government has a monopoly on schools and sets the standards for all schools. The money provided to government schools has exploded in recent decades with no improvement in thinking skills. Their increasing budgets to teach kids to sit down, shut up, and believe what they’re told … seem to have produced no results at all – until now … We now see that the result of all that increased spending is a population more suceptible to believing the earth is flat – based on very weak arguments.

I am able to think, not because of my government school teachers, I am able to think … in spite of my teachers.

An ability to think is all one needs to dismiss the flat earth arguments I have found thus far. For example, one needs no special knowledge to see the weakness of the inductive argument that claims the earth is flat because no one made a sequel to the movie Apollo 13. Likewise, one needs no special knowledge to see that, unlike other conspiracies, a flat earth would require at least 10,000 humans to be in on it. Also, anyone should be able to see that, even if the moon landings were faked, which is pretty unlikely, then a flat earth would still be just as improbable.

The lighthouse claim requires a little more thought than usual, but anyone should be able to see through it if only they had the confidence to try. The claim is based on an article from the 1800’s describing a 300 foot tall lighthouse that was so impressive that sailors could see it from over 60 miles away. Flat earthers claim this would be impossible unless the lighthouse were several thousand feet tall. First, one should be immediatley very skeptical because the claim is based on a single article from the 1800’s, but the the real smoking gun is how flat earthers imply that sailors could see the lighthouse itself from that distance. Think about what sailors would see at the furthest point out where the lighthouse would be useful. We can deduce that they see a fuzzy blinking light on the horizon. It would appear each time the light passed in the direction of the ship and it might have a slight sweeping motion to it. Now consider that the light travels horizontally over the water and not straight up, thus giving it a further reach over a curved ocean surface. Then we can note that flat earthers try to lead us away from such thoughts. So, again we see that no special knowledge is necessary to defeat such claims.

Additionally, many of us do have special knowledge. By the time I got out of high school, I already knew (from independent study) about the following evidence that contradicts the flat earthers: the tides, gravity, redshifts, spectrometry, refraction, reflection, relativity, galaxies, nebulae, telescopes, super novae, evolution, radioactive dating, fossils, Foucault pendulums, water circling a drain, earth’s magnetic field from a spinning iron core, the tilt of the earth’s axis, the coriolis effect, phases of the moon, the earth’s shadow on the moon, round planets having round moons, pictures and video of earth from space, circumnavigation of the globe, hundreds of kinds of satellites and space probes. The diameter of the earth was measured a couple thousand years ago by Archimedes. Since before Columbus, sailors knew the earth was round because ships would appear and disappear over the horizon a few inches at a time because the surface of the ocean is round. Rockets departing at the equator are already moving faster than from points further from the equator. I also learned enough to do the math to disprove some specific claims by flat earthers, such as the claim that it should be impossible to see Chicago across the great lakes.

Nevertheless, a scientific mind is always open to new evidence from sources that have not already proven themselves to be untrustworthy, and thus if a new source has new evidence, then I will hear it.

If Police are Above the Law …

If the cops are above the law, then they are outside the law; and if they are outside the law, then they are outlaws.

This was inspired by the latest police abuse, which happens to also demonstrate the incompetence of government schools as well. This cop clearly feels untouchable even though every kid in every classroom has a camera. Given the growing backlash against how police are above the law, maybe this one will get an appropriate punishment.

Although this cop was not FBI, consider that the FBI are also cops; but they are not just cops – they are cops who work for Obama!