Author Archives: Jim
Author Archives: Jim
Over the last 10 years, I have been building a regimen (augmented by ad hoc remedies) that has now evolved to the point where it has fixed my blood pressure. A few days ago, I decided to not renew my prescription on its last day, and instead, I started an enhanced version of my regimen at the same time – and it worked … fast! I started seeing results by the morning of the third day.
Previously, I had already fixed my arthritis, my back pain (from herniated disks), a hemorrhoid, high blood sugar, kidney stones, gum disease, sub-optimal psychology, irritable bowel syndrome, precancerous skin lesions, and respiratory illness.
The catalyst for this article was when I suddenly decided a few days ago to quit my blood pressure medicine after more than six years because I was tired of the shakedown. You may be familiar with this shakedown. It works like this: When your prescription expires, you need to find a doctor to give you permission to buy more. You know you need it, and it’s your body, and you buy it with the fruits of your own labor; but the doctor thinks it is his right to first make you sign away all your rights, pay him, visit him, give him your blood, and make promises to obey.
Try buying medicine without a doctor’s permission, or try competing with the doctor to provide medical services – you will go to jail, and yet, their advice hasn’t been very helpful to me, and has often been wrong. I guess that’s why they need protection from competition.
I pretty much don’t need them anymore, but did I really beat the cartel … given how Obamacare makes me pay them anyway?
During the shakedown, you may even have to become an actor and pretend that you will follow the doctor’s advice when you may already know better. You must also assert that you are a very happy and well adjusted person (which I always am) who respects the doctor and doesn’t think he is part of a cartel or that he is perpetrating a shakedown; otherwise, he could have you detained for days, drugged, and put on the no-fly list. BTW, the CDC is requesting the right to indefinitely detain you. The doctor could have the government take your kids and your right to keep and bear arms – just on his whim.
Just like the police, the politicians, and the rich and famous … doctors are above the law.
Calling it a shakedown by a cartel is thus an understatement. It is also cronyism, fascism, and tyranny.
In Arrival we learn that national governments, and especially the US government, are very good at everything they do, except for the highly contrived scenario in Arrival. Fortunately, a female scientist saves the world in spite of all those nationalistic men. In fact, this single mom was so good that even those crazy men in the alternative media (that Hillary warned us about), and those men who listen to them, were not able to stop her from saving the world. Why couldn’t they have just trusted the experts?
She is able to save the world because she teaches language classes at a university, and she does it better than anyone in the world, and yet, unlike other teachers, she thinks outside the box. In fact, this teacher thinks outside of the box better than anyone in the world. This was necessary because the aliens were not able to figure out our language, so she had to figure out theirs and teach them ours – even though their language is about a thousand times more complex than ours, and even though they’re … um … aliens.
She shows the world the way to a global government where everything is awesome. You see, the problem in our world today is not enough centralization and standardization …
This all sounds like the propaganda we’ve seen out of Hollywood for the 10,000th time, but this time it is not as in-your-face as it usually is. The in-your-face parts make it seem like the movie is about how government fails and individuals who think outside the box can do better, but it is actually about how national governments fail and experts can save us by giving us global government.
It was masterful the way the movie did not overplay its hand. In fact, it did not portray any LGBT issues or individuals, which has become so prevalent (as if mandated by law) that its absence kind of leaps out at the astute viewer.
This movie is further evidence that the globalist elite are preparing us for Their Coming Peaceful Alien Hoax.
Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder, can be seen saying that we must brainwash people in order to eliminate the “gun culture”. Now any honest person knows he was intentionally conflating the gun culture of the inner city with America’s liberal founding principles, all of which, were his real target … because today’s American liberals are not actually liberal. They are progressives.
Then, just recently, a liberal acquaintance with a PhD, who is surrounded by other PhDs, and who insists she is different because she wants smaller government and individual liberty (which would constitute a real liberal) succumbed to peer pressure. She lumped me in with the “gun culture!” when I mentioned the importance of an armed citizenry for acquiring and maintaining individual liberty. Also, she had previously expressed concern upon seeing me (legally) wearing a sidearm. Hence the need for this article.
Let’s use the “liberal” term “gun culture” against them because guns are indeed of great value to any noble culture and to anyone else in touch with reality. Let’s distinguish inner city (criminal) gun culture from concealed carry, which is a second kind of gun culture, and which is directly concerned with the basic right of defense from individuals who initiate force (e.g. criminals); whereas, America’s founding principles are defended by a third gun culture, which is directly concerned with defense from governments, which are themselves the fourth gun culture.
The most useful definition of government is: A monopoly on the right to initiate force within a geographical boundary. Such a clear definition makes it self-evident that a people must be prepared to defend themselves from any government – not just from those governments who are already known to especially like initiating force (e.g. progressive governments). That’s why a progressive like Obama has always wanted our guns.
The Second Amendment is not about hunting or self-defense. Those rights are self-evident and also not a direct threat to governments anyway. Hunting and self-defense are thus covered by the thousands of rights protected by the Ninth Amendment, which says that everything is a right except for the very few limited powers explicitly granted to the government by the Constitution. Of course, that is the opposite of how the government interprets the Constitution today, which means that almost everything the government does is unconstitutional, but let’s not get sidetracked.
The Second Amendment, the basic right of the people to form militias, is thus a special case of the even more basic right of self-defense against individuals who initiate aggression.
Let’s look at the reality of inner city gun culture, concealed carry culture, America’s founding gun culture, and government gun culture, which includes police, FBI, BATF, DHS, CIA, and the military. Each of these four gun cultures is on one of two sides. On the progressive side, we have the gun cultures of the inner city and of the government, which both use guns to initiate aggression. On the freedom and dignity side, we have the gun cultures of concealed carry and of America’s founding principles, which use guns to prevent initiations of aggression.
Inner City Gun Culture
Inner city culture is well known already – in spite of attempts by the “liberal”establishment media to whitewash it and thereby cover up the atrocity of government dependency that they have perpetrated on the black community. Also, how is it that the party that says it wants to empower the little guy … is the party that wants to disarm the little guy?
Some in the black community are starting to figure out that the inner city is the new plantation, and that “liberals” put them there. Such enlightened black men call themselves Runaway Slaves. They are among my personal heroes.
Concealed Carry Culture
If I am driving in a city or cross country, I will usually be wearing a sidearm because I may need the ability to prevent an initiation of aggression. That is also why I lock my car doors.
I lock my car doors – not to protect me from any first time criminals outside – but to protect any first time criminals outside … from me.
Concealed carry permit holders are a culture beyond reproach, which is probably why even the discredited “liberal” establishment media doesn’t go there.
Consider that cops are convicted of crimes 600% more often than concealed carry permit holders. When one also considers that cops are above the law vs. ordinary citizens, then we can safely assume that a cop who committed a crime, at least against an ordinary citizen, is 600% less likely to be indicted and convicted. Therefore, we should assume that the average cop is 36 times more likely to commit a crime compared to the average concealed carry permit holder.
Government Gun Culture
Everyone has seen videos of cops brutalizing and framing the people, and former cops tell me that one cannot work in any jurisdiction for more than three years without at least being an accomplice to such abuse. One even told me that he cannot count the times he had to walk away from other cops who were about to frame someone. He did not want to be a witness and he would not lie in court, but he could not testify against other cops either – because they would have killed him.
The purpose of government gun culture is obviously to manufacture the kind of obedient sociopaths who will not hesitate to kill innocent people in their own homes. Of course, it is hard for government to manufacture as many obedient sociopaths as they think they need, which is why government likes drones. We can see the government agenda in Obama’s unconstitutional new power to assassinate Americans with drones, even on American soil.
We can see the government agenda in how they perpetrated 9/11 to justify more of a police state, such as the Patriot Act.
America’s Founding Gun Culture
Freedom without guns is unsustainable.
Tyranny with guns is unsustainable.
The purpose of the Second Amendment is to defend the rest of them.
The British population has less gun deaths than the American population.
Slave populations have less gun deaths than the British population.
Prison populations have less gun deaths than slave populations.
“Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?”
― Patrick Henry
Beware of strong drink.
For it can make one shoot at kings …
“Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest.”
Does Europe regret letting the globalist elite disarm it yet?
Many of the mass shootings in Europe were black ops.
They were a pretense used to disarm the people.
Does Europe know it has been played?
Sweden (pop.10 million) now has 1 million Muslim immigrants.
They are mostly young men who are thus not refugees.
If a Swede says they are not refugees, he will go to jail.
Also, rape is up 1500%.
If a Swede says they are causing the rape increase, he will go to jail.
Do Europeans regret letting the globalist elite disarm them yet?
Do Europeans know they have been played?
Now the globalist elite see the armed American people as the last thing standing between them and their New World Order.
One either supports guns, or one supports rape, tyranny, and genocide.
One either supports the people, or one supports the globalist elite.
All the Global Warming models said that the natural result of CO2 rising at 2 parts per million per year should have been temperatures rising significantly over the last 19 years, but instead, temperatures have been flat! There has been no global warming! Therefore, given that Global Warming exists … as a natural result of CO2 increase, the fact that all the models predicting global warming have been wrong … constitutes unequivocal proof of human tampering with climate to hide Global Warming.
Now that we see there is a conspiracy powerful enough to halt Global Warming, is it any wonder why Michael Mann had to use fudged data and a fudged algorithm to create the hockey stick chart in order to get the policies we need to halt Global Warming? Is it any wonder why defenders of science had to bypass peer review and block others from reproducing Mann’s results for as long as possible?
Clearly, climate denial is a vast alt-right conspiracy lead by Donald Trump in America, and headed by Vladimir Putin.
EndOfInnocence.com is the best example of those sites that hide their true motives by never supporting Trump or Putin. It even tries to teach people to think for themselves instead of believing the experts! It is thus sites like EndOfInnocence.com that pose the greatest threat to our New World Order.
The Washington Post informs me that I am being played by Putin.
Bullshit! I’m not being played! I am one of the players!
It’s not just me. It’s the whole liberty movement. We all work for Putin (the former KGB agent). The socialists and progressives see right through us because they obviously have such a firm grasp on reality. That’s why they agree with their leader, Hillary Clinton, who says we are all deplorable and irredeemable. In other words, we are less than human – like how everyone sees cannibals – like how their great grand father saw his family’s slaves – and how their grand father saw Jews … So in touch with reality they are.
I was not aware of some of these sites, so I would like to say “Thanks!” to the Washington Post for telling me so many sites where I can find the truth. Saves me lots of time.
Although EndOfInnocence.com is not explicitly mentioned on their enemies list, many of the sites listed are on the same page as EndOfInnocence on most issues. Some of them are in the list of recommended sites on EndOfInnocence. In fact, many of them are less extreme than EndOfInnocence. Therefore, my main concern is … What am I doing wrong?! How do I get on that list?!
On a more serious note, at least one of these sites (Paul Craig Roberts) is indeed anti-American and pro-Russian. It is a fake anti-establishment site. It is a Psyop, but it is far more likely to be CIA than Russian. It uses real conspiracies as bait while trying to make Americans feel bad about being Americans and while subtley promoting big government. It is like a sneakier version of the socialist and progressive sites.
While I am being serious, why would the Washington Post, which vies with the NYT to be the most important newspaper in America, make such an extreme credibility destroying move right after having lost so much of their remaining credibility after getting caught cheating for Hillary? Such an extreme move smacks of desperation.
From what could they be so desperate to distract us? Could it be Pizzagate, which by itself could set the globalist elite back 50 years?
How do we know they exist?
You know … the globalists, also known as: the New World Order, the shadow government, the deep state, etc.
How do we know there is one cabal with the ability to perpetrate and cover up conspiracies such as 9/11?
Certainly they couldn’t be omnipotent or else they would wouldn’t have to hide in the shadows …
Are the building blocks there? Well … we know that people having no conscience exist, and we know that people who value power above all else exist. We know that hate, greed, intelligence, hierarchy, and secrecy exist. Threats, bribes, blackmail and extortion exist. Deceit, bias, and superstition exist. Spies, surveillance, informants, infiltrators, and agent provocateurs exist. Propaganda, false flags, and cover ups exist. Patience and delayed gratification exist. Secret societies and conspiracies exist … so … all of the basic building blocks are there, but what about more concrete mechanisms that we know exist?
Intelligence agencies and national security exist. Torture, redaction, and secret courts (FISA) exist. The power of the President to assassinate or indefinitely detain a citizen (NDAA) exists. The ability to secretly create trillions of dollars out of thin air (Federal Reserve, money as electronic bits, and fractional reserve banking) exists. Constitutional violations exist. Propaganda budgets exist. People above the law exist, like Hillary Clinton, and we just saw how the entire media and crony corporations (the Internet gatekeepers) conspired to elect Hillary.
It is not necessary that their plans always succeed in order for their agenda to advance. It is only necessary that not too many people see the conspiracy. For example, if they needed a terrorist incident to manipulate the public into supporting more of a police state (e.g. The Patriot Act), then they could fail repeatedly until they succeeded – as long as not too many people knew the truth about any of those efforts. (The truth denies what deception provides.)
It is not necessary that they successfully hide all of a conspiracy in order for their agenda to advance. It is only necessary that not too many see how high the conspiracy really goes. For example, in the case of the 2016 election, too many people now know that much of the media and crony corporations (the Internet gatekeepers) conspired to elect Hillary, but what if Trump were also working for them? In that case, their agenda would still move forward.
Nevertheless, for a single cabal to exist at the top for decades or even centuries, we know it would need another level of motivation, power, and tools beyond what we have discussed thus far in order to carry out a plan and keep it secret. For example, there might be as much as one hundred layers of hierarchy from the top down to the cop on the street, and thus they certainly couldn’t pass orders down through a chain of command that deep because that would leave too much evidence and there would be too many whistleblowers to keep it secret.
One of the simplest but most effective tools used by the cabal to maintain secrecy is compartmentalization, which is where an agent performing a task is only given the minimum information and motivation needed to carry out a specific task. It is not necessary that each player in a conspiracy know the whole plan or even that he is part of a conspiracy. Such an agent doesn’t know the motives or identities of those at the top, and doesn’t even have any way to verify where the top originates.
An agent could be working for a foreign entity … or even extraterrestrials … he doesn’t really know. He only knows that he trusts the guy directly above him, beside him, and under him. All the rest is a narrative he has been sold. If he has a conscience, then the narrative convinces him he is working for the good guys. If he has no conscience, then he doesn’t need a narrative, he is just doing it for the reward and because he likes doing the task itself. (Both types have value. One is willing to do things prohibited by a normal conscience, and the other is more motivated and may even be willing to die for his cause.)
Now consider that, just like in any secret society, a different narrative can be given to members at each level. For example, one can easily imagine a narrative that would persuade certain members of the CIA to perpetrate 9/11. After all, only 3000 people died, the important people were warned ahead of time, the buildings were going to be demolished anyway, and without 9/11, we couldn’t have enacted laws like the Patriot Act, which we needed to protect us from terrorists who might use a nuke and kill three million instead of three thousand. An agent who perpetrated 9/11 thus helped to save millions of lives. He is a hero … at least … that is the narrative he has bought, and of course, if he has no conscience then he doesn’t need a narrative. Those below this level might not be told that the most important people were warned ahead of time; whereas, those above this level might be told that the Patriot Act is a necessary step to achieving global government.
Now suppose an agent started to doubt that he is working for the good guys. He would not go from true believer to whistleblower all at once. He would give off signs that warn his handlers, and thus before he betrayed them, they would neutralize him. Consider that pretty much the entire business of the CIA can be described as ways to detect who needs to be neutralized, and then to neutralize them – and keep it secret.
To be continued …
Those at the top (a.k.a. the globalist elite, the new world order, the shadow government, and the deep state) are not omnipotent. They are just psychopaths hiding in the shadows. They are just players who have been slowly and secretly consolidating power for decades, and perhaps for centuries.
Their plays only work because we are asleep, but as each of us awakens to the truth and becomes immune to their plays, they lose power. Just as deception provides what the truth denies, the truth denies what deception provides.
America is the goose that laid the golden egg. It is their power base, and so, inside America, they had preferred the more peaceful route to global domination, which was Hillary, but we wouldn’t just give it to them. Using the truth, we made Hillary too much of a liability and thereby forced them to go with Trump, who was their plan B. From their perspective, we will get what we deserve because those who make peaceful enslavement impossible, make violent enslavement inevitable.
They are currently desperate, and thus at maximum danger.
On March 2nd, 2016, the most likely plan by the globalists (to those lacking inside information) was: Trump is a Ringer. Hillary is Trump’s Bitch. It was within Trump’s power from the beginning to guarantee a Clinton Victory – like Ross Perot did for Bill Clinton. In exchange, one must assume that Trump would have owned Hillary. Of course, there was nothing Trump could do to guarantee his own victory given how the globalists control government, the media, voting machines, and the Internet gatekeepers. Such cheating could deliver about 25% of the total votes to a candidate – like it did for Obama. Therefore, those who said they knew Trump would win because of his true appeal to voters or because of his persuasive skills were not accounting for how the world really works.
In other words, an anti-establishment candidate would have to be worthy of a 25% margin of victory in a fair system just to get 50% of the vote in our rigged system. Given a fair system, in Trump’s case, he would have only won with a 10% spread instead of 25%. Just for comparison, Ronald Reagan would have won with a 30% spread. It may seem like Trump would have won with a bigger spread given a fair system, but the unfairness of the system and the bias and violence of Hillary voters was a large part of Trump’s appeal. Of course, given a fair system, Trump and Hillary would never have been candidates in the first place.
Trump barely won the electoral vote and lost the popular vote. He would have lost if any one of the things in his favor had not happened. Trump would have lost without Hillary’s health, Project Veritas, Wikileaks, Dinesh D’Souza, Weinergate, or without any one of many other factors that no one predicted. Even what little damage was done to Hillary by James Comey was enough to give Trump his slim margin of victory. Trump would have lost if several hard core delusional leftists in the media, such as Chris Matthews and Michael Moore, had not inexplicably begun helping him the week before the election. Trump would have lost if several popular libertarians and anarchists, such as Alex Jones and Stefan Molyneux, had not unexplicably begun promoting him hard. Trump would have lost if the media and the government had decided to make the allegations against him stick – at least through the election. He would have lost if anyone had released another candid audio clip, of which several must certainly have been available.
Given Hillary’s bad health, and given how the globalists let Brexit happen, and given the highly improbable help one or two weeks before the election, it appeared plausible, though not likely, that the globalists had decided near election time that they wanted Trump to win; and with Trump’s victory, and with his immediate backpedaling, we now know that is what happened – but why?
I think the globalists had decided that if Hillary had won, then government, academia, the media, and crony corporations would have lost too much credibility and would rightly have been seen as the enemy by too many people. If that had happened, then the globalists would have faced far more resistance going forward. They would even have been at risk of losing everything; whereas, now, they can claim that the system worked and that it was fair. For their agenda to succeed, the people must believe they are free and in control. Harriet Tubman said, “I freed a thousand slaves, and I could have freed a thousand more, if only they had known they were slaves.”
Another benefit from Hillary’s loss is the ease with which globalists can provoke violence from the losers, and consider that all conflict can be used by the globalists as a pretext for more of a police state. Of course, they could have provoked as much conflict if Trump had lost, but now they can get two-for-one if they have the electoral college elect Hillary. This seems unlikely, but it is the kind of thing they can do when they are ready to incite insurrection.
It is more likely that they will not risk their credibility by using the electoral college to elect Hillary because they can simply wait 4 years and get the electoral collage repealed by a Constitutional amendment proposed by the next globalist President and his globalist Congress. It would be expensve to get ratification by 38 of the 50 states, but it would be worth it to them, and they could certainly fudge a few states.
Perhaps the main benefit of a Hillary loss for the globalists is how they can claim that bad voters elected bad people, and then, at any time, the globalists can trigger the collapse they have had primed for years, and their media will blame it on nationalists, conservatives, capitalists, racists, patriots, and anti-establishment types. For the problems caused by the globalists, their front men will propose solutions that will indirectly and eventually advance their agenda, which is: one world currency, one world government, one world religion, total dependence on government, total control by government, and total powerlessness of individuals.
Trump will feign reluctance when he gives in to globalist solutions for the crash they themselves caused. Consider that Trump not only was a Demoocrat, but that in 2013 he proposed the globalist solution to the crash of 2008 when he said, “We will have to leave borders behind and go for global unity when it comes to financial stability.”
These are volatile times, and thus there are other possibilities, but a last minute switch to Trump by the globalists seems the most probable. It is almost as likley that they wanted Trump all along and were playing both us and most of their own front men and all of their useful idiots the whole time in order to give Trump street cred as the anti-globalist candidate. There is perhaps a 1% chance that Trump is backpedaling to deceive the globalists so they don’t do anything extreme to stop him before the electoral college votes and before he takes office. There is even a 1% chance that if we block too many of their moves by outing them ahead of time, then they will trump us by inciting insurrection and blaming it on us, which in the short term could be done through an electoral college surprise or a recount surprise.
Where I think they have miscalculated is that I don’t think they will be able to blame their opponents to the extent they need. In fact, we can derail their plans for years if we wake up enough people so that their attempted misdirection becomes too risky for them. Consider that we derailed their plans for Hillary by making her too much of a liability for them. We thereby forced them to go with their plan B.
The crash will have to come in January 2018 at the earliest to ensure that it is blamed on anti-establishment types and not on Obama. It is possible (30%) that this could be the big one … where the globalists perpetrate a 3 – 12 month collpase, declare martial law, trade bread for guns at FEMA camps, implant RFID chips, force vaccinations, bring in foreign troops, ban cash, collapse the US dollar, and execute a “night of the long knives” to take out likely resistance leaders. Such an extreme move would be pretty risky for them, so I think a lesser crisis is more likely, and if we wake up enough people before then, I suspect their plan B will be a crash more like 2008 with a modest move towards global currency.
A useful word to begin using is collaborator. Top progressives and neocons (Republican progressives) are collaborators.
Consider how Germans began to talk about loyalty in the 1920’s and 30’s. I don’t think this is coincidence. I think the US is being herded into the position of Germany in WWI and WWII.
The globalists see the armed American people as the last thing standing between them and global domination. This includes that minority of the US military still more loyal to the US people than to the government. Therefore, they must take down the American people as soon as they think they can succeed without looking like the bad guys.
I can’t stand to lie
I’m not that naïve
I’m just out to find
The better part of me
I’m more than a turd
I’m more than a bane
More than some big disgrace behind the reign
It’s not easy to be me
Wish that I could cry
Fall upon my knees
Find a way to lie
About the balls I’ll never see
It may sound absurd
But don’t be naïve
Even zeroes have the right to breed
I may be disturbed
But won’t you concede
Even zeroes have the right to dream
It’s not easy to be me
Grow up and just stay
Away from me
It’s not all right
You cannot sleep sound tonight
It’s too crazy
I can’t stand to lie
I’m not that naïve
Men weren’t meant to thrive
Without balls between their knees.
I’m only a man hiding out in DC
Digging for something right on this one way street
Only a man hiding out on E Street
Looking for special things inside of me
It’s not easy to be me.
Many who refuse to vote have been played by the Don’t Vote Psyop.
Consider that I vote even though I don’t need any rulers, which makes me a kind of anarchist – an anarchist who votes – but only for candidates who might effect a net gain in freedom, reality, and quality of life.
I know that democracy is illegitimate.
I know that the Constitution either authorizes the government we have, or has been unable to prevent it.
I know that one vote cannot make a difference.
I know all of this, and still I vote.
I know that the system is rigged so that it has become nearly impossible for good candidates to win or to effect change if they do win.
I know that government schools, mainstream churches, crony corporations, the entire mainstream media, most of the “alternative” media, millions of individuals who depend on government, and millions of other useful idiots …
will fabricate …
will prevent debate …
to prevent good candidates from winning …
to prevent them from effecting change if they do win …
and to prevent them from existing in the first place …
just as there were no capitalist candidates in the USSR.
I know that most good people, at any point, can be turned with bribes and threats.
I know that any good person who is about to effect change, and who cannot be turned, will be killed.
I know all of this, and still I vote.
I know that the perpetrators (the enemies of humanity) and their useful idiots will spout the logical fallacy that if I vote, then I support the system, but of course, it is possible to vote and not support the system – I do it all the time.
Those at the top are just trying to bully me into not voting. Naturally, if you are awake, then they don’t want you to vote, which is why they spread the logically fallacious meme that voting is acceptance of the system. I call this the Don’t Vote Psyop.
I know that the Don’t Vote Psyop makes my vote even less effective, but still I vote.
Most of the people don’t know any of the things I know, but they do know that “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable.” When violent revolution comes, the media will spin it as how so-called rebels chose to fight rather than vote, and they will thus succeed in making those who refused to vote be unfairly viewed as the scourge of humanity. Then, it will be even more difficult to educate others – to put it mildly.
There are other reasons to vote.
Consider that one can write in any name for President. Now consider that if there are no other candidates in any other races who might be a net gain, then not voting for them would make it clear that someone who voted rejected all of those other candidates. That is worth saying. Also, imagine that universally accepted good guy James Corbett (among those who refuse to vote) received one write-in vote. Now imagine that he received one million write-in votes. That would send a message that is worth the effort of saying it.
Sometimes, the correct decision is actually voting for the lesser of two evils, but only if they were even in an accurate poll, and only if there were no third candidate who had any chance of winning. For example, suppose you had access to the results of an accurate poll of every voter in your state, and suppose that Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton got the exact same number of votes in that poll. Now suppose you believed that Donald Trump was clearly the lesser of two evils, and was thus clearly a net gain over Hillary, but you used your weapon (your vote) to vote third party, or suppose you didn’t use you weapon at all, and then Hillary won your state by one vote … and suppose winning your state caused Hillary to win the Presidency … That would make you a pretty douchy person. You would know it, and everyone you know would know it. You would never live it down.
To be clear, voting is the least effective thing I do. It is far more valuable to educate myself and others, but that is also far more time consuming and expensive. I wouldn’t vote if it cost me any more time, money, or other trouble, and I wouldn’t vote if there were no candidates who might effect a net gain. Nor would I fight for the right to vote in such a corrupt. anti-human. illegitimate system because voting is so ineffective, and especially because voting is how the rulers make the people believe that they are free and that their rulers are legitimate. Harriet Tubman said, “I freed a thousand slaves, and I could have freed a thousand more … if only they had known they were slaves.”
Finally, your act of voting will generate good will from others; whereas, not voting is a slap in the face to others. Voting signals to others that you are responsible and peaceful, and it is even an opportunity to educate those at the ballot box who will be more engaged than at any other time.
Anyone who falls for the Don’t Vote Psyop has been played.
Napoleon said …
Every soldier carries a Field Marshal’s baton in his pack.
The opportunity was there.
Anyone could rise from the bottom to the top.
That used to be America.
But America is a corrupt cronyist system.
That’s why America is circling the drain.
Who can rise to the top of a cronyist system?
Only cronies …
Government, corporations, the media …
The top are corrupt cronies.
I know this because I was at the top.
Now I’ve been kicked out of the club.
They’re all on the same side.
Democrats, Republicans …
Bushes, Clintons, Obamas …
They work for the same people.
And they will do anything to maintain their power.
What do they want?
What do they want for you?
They want you powerless and dependent.
Look at what they have done to the black community.
Harriet Tubman said …
I freed a thousand slaves,
and I could have free a thousand more …
If only they had known they were slaves.
I could stop here …
but their propaganda machine won’t let me.
If we’re going to make America great again,
we have to fight back.
We know they’re liars.
They know they’re liars.
They can manufacture many new accusers each day …
if that’s what they think they need.
Which gets us back to how slaves didn’t know they were slaves.
Today … we have elections.
That’s how the people know they’re free. <smirk>
But how can an election be fair …
If the media are all on one side?
If they are playing, good cop – bad cop?
If the media fabricate and censor?
If the corporations fabricate and censor?
Whether you believe we were created …
or the product of evolution …
The leftist, feminist, politically correct agenda …
Goes against our genes.
Such denial …
That’s why violence and racism are worse.
That’s why no one is happy.
That’s why America is cirling the drain.
Women want to get married and have kids.
Men want to get married and have kids.
So, why do the media ridicule what 96% want?
Why do they ridicule what works?
Why do they promote every other arrangement?
But there is also tension.
Men want to impregnate as many women as possible,
And women want to be impregnated with the best genes,
Which are those men who can impregnate the most women.
It should come as no surprise then, what happens …
In the world of politicians, Hollywood, and the rich.
Addiction is rampant …
Because opportunity is rampant.
If you find women irresistable, you can have women.
That may not be a fashionable arrangement anymore,
But that is the least of their crimes …
In a culture addicted to drugs …
In a culture that flies to Pedophile Island …
Lookup the Franklin Scandal.
Many at the top, around the world, are pedophiles.
They think you just don’t understand.
She defended a man she believed had raped a 12 year old girl.
She called the girl a liar.
She laughed about the whole thing.
You can listen to the audio yourself.
But that’s not how she knows so much about it.
She’s married to Bill Clinton.
She not only said his rape victims were liars …
She destroyed them.
Like Bill Clinton …
Like Socrates …
I find women irresistable.
It’s how they look. It’s how they act.
Women were irresistable to me …
when I was younger.
On TV how you look …
How you act …
It’s part of the job description.
It is the job description.
I’m a tall, famous, rich, and powerful alpha male.
That’s the genes women are looking for.
I am irresistable to many women …
especially in that world.
My locker room talk was not fabrication,
but it was exaggeration.
and unlike Bill Clinton …
If women didn’t reciprocate …
I let them be.
You can vote for the kown perpetrator and/or promoter of rape …
Negligence, deceit …
Corruption, cronyism …
Racism, poverty …
Murder, conspiracy …
Dictators, pedophiles …
Terrorism, treason …
War, and genocide …
The perpetrator … to be …
Of a draft …
and of a civil war inducing gun decision from her Supreme Court
You can vote for the Kissing Bandito.
If you want to see the future of the denial that runs America,
Just look at Sweden.
This country of 10 million has one million Muslim immigrants –
Mostly young men – not real refugees.
Sweden also has a 1500% increase in rape,
But if you say it’s the Muslims,
Or if you say they’re not real refugees,
You will go to jail.
America has a choice.
If Americans continue to live in denial …
America will continue to circle the drain.
If Americans are ready to think for themselves,
If Americans are ready to grow up,
we can make America great again.
I, a libertarian, voluntaryist, anarchist, anarcho capitalist, agorist, etc. would vote for Trump if he gave this speech because he might be a significant net gain for freedom, reality, and quality of life; whereas, Hillary, Jill Stein, and Gary Johnson would all be a definite net loss.
Ordinarily I would have voted for the Libertarian Party candidate, Gary Johnson, but he has so clearly sold out that he would simply be a net loss for freedom, reality, and quality of life – one way or another. That’s the whole point of selling out.
Also, the other candidates all seem to be terrified of what people might say about them, which makes it nearly impossible for them to fight effectively; whereas, Trump …
Nevertheless … I would not give money or time to Trump because he only – might – be a net gain. I would only give money or time to a candidate who was a highly probable net gain. For example, I gave money to Gary Johnson in 2012.
Also, I’m not persuaded by the “Don’t Vote“ Psyop. If you are awake, they don’t want you to vote. So, if you don’t vote, then you have been played.