ArchiveCategory Archives for "Conspiracy"
The facts and the most probable theories that are consistent with the facts. Not afraid to talk about the New World Order, the globalist elite, the shadow government, the deep state, etc.
The facts and the most probable theories that are consistent with the facts. Not afraid to talk about the New World Order, the globalist elite, the shadow government, the deep state, etc.
In Arrival we learn that national governments, and especially the US government, are very good at everything they do, except for the highly contrived scenario in Arrival. Fortunately, a female scientist saves the world in spite of all those nationalistic men. In fact, this single mom was so good that even those crazy men in the alternative media (that Hillary warned us about), and those men who listen to them, were not able to stop her from saving the world. Why couldn’t they have just trusted the experts?
She is able to save the world because she teaches language classes at a university, and she does it better than anyone in the world, and yet, unlike other teachers, she thinks outside the box. In fact, this teacher thinks outside of the box better than anyone in the world. This was necessary because the aliens were not able to figure out our language, so she had to figure out theirs and teach them ours – even though their language is about a thousand times more complex than ours, and even though they’re … um … aliens.
She shows the world the way to a global government where everything is awesome. You see, the problem in our world today is not enough centralization and standardization …
This all sounds like the propaganda we’ve seen out of Hollywood for the 10,000th time, but this time it is not as in-your-face as it usually is. The in-your-face parts make it seem like the movie is about how government fails and individuals who think outside the box can do better, but it is actually about how national governments fail and experts can save us by giving us global government.
It was masterful the way the movie did not overplay its hand. In fact, it did not portray any LGBT issues or individuals, which has become so prevalent (as if mandated by law) that its absence kind of leaps out at the astute viewer.
This movie is further evidence that the globalist elite are preparing us for Their Coming Peaceful Alien Hoax.
All the Global Warming models said that the natural result of CO2 rising at 2 parts per million per year should have been temperatures rising significantly over the last 19 years, but instead, temperatures have been flat! There has been no global warming! Therefore, given that Global Warming exists … as a natural result of CO2 increase, the fact that all the models predicting global warming have been wrong … constitutes unequivocal proof of human tampering with climate to hide Global Warming.
Now that we see there is a conspiracy powerful enough to halt Global Warming, is it any wonder why Michael Mann had to use fudged data and a fudged algorithm to create the hockey stick chart in order to get the policies we need to halt Global Warming? Is it any wonder why defenders of science had to bypass peer review and block others from reproducing Mann’s results for as long as possible?
Clearly, climate denial is a vast alt-right conspiracy lead by Donald Trump in America, and headed by Vladimir Putin.
EndOfInnocence.com is the best example of those sites that hide their true motives by never supporting Trump or Putin. It even tries to teach people to think for themselves instead of believing the experts! It is thus sites like EndOfInnocence.com that pose the greatest threat to our New World Order.
The Washington Post informs me that I am being played by Putin.
Bullshit! I’m not being played! I am one of the players!
It’s not just me. It’s the whole liberty movement. We all work for Putin (the former KGB agent). The socialists and progressives see right through us because they obviously have such a firm grasp on reality. That’s why they agree with their leader, Hillary Clinton, who says we are all deplorable and irredeemable. In other words, we are less than human – like how everyone sees cannibals – like how their great grand father saw his family’s slaves – and how their grand father saw Jews … So in touch with reality they are.
I was not aware of some of these sites, so I would like to say “Thanks!” to the Washington Post for telling me so many sites where I can find the truth. Saves me lots of time.
Although EndOfInnocence.com is not explicitly mentioned on their enemies list, many of the sites listed are on the same page as EndOfInnocence on most issues. Some of them are in the list of recommended sites on EndOfInnocence. In fact, many of them are less extreme than EndOfInnocence. Therefore, my main concern is … What am I doing wrong?! How do I get on that list?!
On a more serious note, at least one of these sites (Paul Craig Roberts) is indeed anti-American and pro-Russian. It is a fake anti-establishment site. It is a Psyop, but it is far more likely to be CIA than Russian. It uses real conspiracies as bait while trying to make Americans feel bad about being Americans and while subtley promoting big government. It is like a sneakier version of the socialist and progressive sites.
While I am being serious, why would the Washington Post, which vies with the NYT to be the most important newspaper in America, make such an extreme credibility destroying move right after having lost so much of their remaining credibility after getting caught cheating for Hillary? Such an extreme move smacks of desperation.
From what could they be so desperate to distract us? Could it be Pizzagate, which by itself could set the globalist elite back 50 years?
How do we know they exist?
You know … the globalists, also known as: the New World Order, the shadow government, the deep state, etc.
How do we know there is one cabal with the ability to perpetrate and cover up conspiracies such as 9/11?
Certainly they couldn’t be omnipotent or else they would wouldn’t have to hide in the shadows …
Are the building blocks there? Well … we know that people having no conscience exist, and we know that people who value power above all else exist. We know that hate, greed, intelligence, hierarchy, and secrecy exist. Threats, bribes, blackmail and extortion exist. Deceit, bias, and superstition exist. Spies, surveillance, informants, infiltrators, and agent provocateurs exist. Propaganda, false flags, and cover ups exist. Patience and delayed gratification exist. Secret societies and conspiracies exist … so … all of the basic building blocks are there, but what about more concrete mechanisms that we know exist?
Intelligence agencies and national security exist. Torture, redaction, and secret courts (FISA) exist. The power of the President to assassinate or indefinitely detain a citizen (NDAA) exists. The ability to secretly create trillions of dollars out of thin air (Federal Reserve, money as electronic bits, and fractional reserve banking) exists. Constitutional violations exist. Propaganda budgets exist. People above the law exist, like Hillary Clinton, and we just saw how the entire media and crony corporations (the Internet gatekeepers) conspired to elect Hillary.
It is not necessary that their plans always succeed in order for their agenda to advance. It is only necessary that not too many people see the conspiracy. For example, if they needed a terrorist incident to manipulate the public into supporting more of a police state (e.g. The Patriot Act), then they could fail repeatedly until they succeeded – as long as not too many people knew the truth about any of those efforts. (The truth denies what deception provides.)
It is not necessary that they successfully hide all of a conspiracy in order for their agenda to advance. It is only necessary that not too many see how high the conspiracy really goes. For example, in the case of the 2016 election, too many people now know that much of the media and crony corporations (the Internet gatekeepers) conspired to elect Hillary, but what if Trump were also working for them? In that case, their agenda would still move forward.
Nevertheless, for a single cabal to exist at the top for decades or even centuries, we know it would need another level of motivation, power, and tools beyond what we have discussed thus far in order to carry out a plan and keep it secret. For example, there might be as much as one hundred layers of hierarchy from the top down to the cop on the street, and thus they certainly couldn’t pass orders down through a chain of command that deep because that would leave too much evidence and there would be too many whistleblowers to keep it secret.
One of the simplest but most effective tools used by the cabal to maintain secrecy is compartmentalization, which is where an agent performing a task is only given the minimum information and motivation needed to carry out a specific task. It is not necessary that each player in a conspiracy know the whole plan or even that he is part of a conspiracy. Such an agent doesn’t know the motives or identities of those at the top, and doesn’t even have any way to verify where the top originates.
An agent could be working for a foreign entity … or even extraterrestrials … he doesn’t really know. He only knows that he trusts the guy directly above him, beside him, and under him. All the rest is a narrative he has been sold. If he has a conscience, then the narrative convinces him he is working for the good guys. If he has no conscience, then he doesn’t need a narrative, he is just doing it for the reward and because he likes doing the task itself. (Both types have value. One is willing to do things prohibited by a normal conscience, and the other is more motivated and may even be willing to die for his cause.)
Now consider that, just like in any secret society, a different narrative can be given to members at each level. For example, one can easily imagine a narrative that would persuade certain members of the CIA to perpetrate 9/11. After all, only 3000 people died, the important people were warned ahead of time, the buildings were going to be demolished anyway, and without 9/11, we couldn’t have enacted laws like the Patriot Act, which we needed to protect us from terrorists who might use a nuke and kill three million instead of three thousand. An agent who perpetrated 9/11 thus helped to save millions of lives. He is a hero … at least … that is the narrative he has bought, and of course, if he has no conscience then he doesn’t need a narrative. Those below this level might not be told that the most important people were warned ahead of time; whereas, those above this level might be told that the Patriot Act is a necessary step to achieving global government.
Now suppose an agent started to doubt that he is working for the good guys. He would not go from true believer to whistleblower all at once. He would give off signs that warn his handlers, and thus before he betrayed them, they would neutralize him. Consider that pretty much the entire business of the CIA can be described as ways to detect who needs to be neutralized, and then to neutralize them – and keep it secret.
To be continued …
Those at the top (a.k.a. the globalist elite, the new world order, the shadow government, and the deep state) are not omnipotent. They are just psychopaths hiding in the shadows. They are just players who have been slowly and secretly consolidating power for decades, and perhaps for centuries.
Their plays only work because we are asleep, but as each of us awakens to the truth and becomes immune to their plays, they lose power. Just as deception provides what the truth denies, the truth denies what deception provides.
America is the goose that laid the golden egg. It is their power base, and so, inside America, they had preferred the more peaceful route to global domination, which was Hillary, but we wouldn’t just give it to them. Using the truth, we made Hillary too much of a liability and thereby forced them to go with Trump, who was their plan B. From their perspective, we will get what we deserve because those who make peaceful enslavement impossible, make violent enslavement inevitable.
They are currently desperate, and thus at maximum danger.
On March 2nd, 2016, the most likely plan by the globalists (to those lacking inside information) was: Trump is a Ringer. Hillary is Trump’s Bitch. It was within Trump’s power from the beginning to guarantee a Clinton Victory – like Ross Perot did for Bill Clinton. In exchange, one must assume that Trump would have owned Hillary. Of course, there was nothing Trump could do to guarantee his own victory given how the globalists control government, the media, voting machines, and the Internet gatekeepers. Such cheating could deliver about 25% of the total votes to a candidate – like it did for Obama. Therefore, those who said they knew Trump would win because of his true appeal to voters or because of his persuasive skills were not accounting for how the world really works.
In other words, an anti-establishment candidate would have to be worthy of a 25% margin of victory in a fair system just to get 50% of the vote in our rigged system. Given a fair system, in Trump’s case, he would have only won with a 10% spread instead of 25%. Just for comparison, Ronald Reagan would have won with a 30% spread. It may seem like Trump would have won with a bigger spread given a fair system, but the unfairness of the system and the bias and violence of Hillary voters was a large part of Trump’s appeal. Of course, given a fair system, Trump and Hillary would never have been candidates in the first place.
Trump barely won the electoral vote and lost the popular vote. He would have lost if any one of the things in his favor had not happened. Trump would have lost without Hillary’s health, Project Veritas, Wikileaks, Dinesh D’Souza, Weinergate, or without any one of many other factors that no one predicted. Even what little damage was done to Hillary by James Comey was enough to give Trump his slim margin of victory. Trump would have lost if several hard core delusional leftists in the media, such as Chris Matthews and Michael Moore, had not inexplicably begun helping him the week before the election. Trump would have lost if several popular libertarians and anarchists, such as Alex Jones and Stefan Molyneux, had not unexplicably begun promoting him hard. Trump would have lost if the media and the government had decided to make the allegations against him stick – at least through the election. He would have lost if anyone had released another candid audio clip, of which several must certainly have been available.
Given Hillary’s bad health, and given how the globalists let Brexit happen, and given the highly improbable help one or two weeks before the election, it appeared plausible, though not likely, that the globalists had decided near election time that they wanted Trump to win; and with Trump’s victory, and with his immediate backpedaling, we now know that is what happened – but why?
I think the globalists had decided that if Hillary had won, then government, academia, the media, and crony corporations would have lost too much credibility and would rightly have been seen as the enemy by too many people. If that had happened, then the globalists would have faced far more resistance going forward. They would even have been at risk of losing everything; whereas, now, they can claim that the system worked and that it was fair. For their agenda to succeed, the people must believe they are free and in control. Harriet Tubman said, “I freed a thousand slaves, and I could have freed a thousand more, if only they had known they were slaves.”
Another benefit from Hillary’s loss is the ease with which globalists can provoke violence from the losers, and consider that all conflict can be used by the globalists as a pretext for more of a police state. Of course, they could have provoked as much conflict if Trump had lost, but now they can get two-for-one if they have the electoral college elect Hillary. This seems unlikely, but it is the kind of thing they can do when they are ready to incite insurrection.
It is more likely that they will not risk their credibility by using the electoral college to elect Hillary because they can simply wait 4 years and get the electoral collage repealed by a Constitutional amendment proposed by the next globalist President and his globalist Congress. It would be expensve to get ratification by 38 of the 50 states, but it would be worth it to them, and they could certainly fudge a few states.
Perhaps the main benefit of a Hillary loss for the globalists is how they can claim that bad voters elected bad people, and then, at any time, the globalists can trigger the collapse they have had primed for years, and their media will blame it on nationalists, conservatives, capitalists, racists, patriots, and anti-establishment types. For the problems caused by the globalists, their front men will propose solutions that will indirectly and eventually advance their agenda, which is: one world currency, one world government, one world religion, total dependence on government, total control by government, and total powerlessness of individuals.
Trump will feign reluctance when he gives in to globalist solutions for the crash they themselves caused. Consider that Trump not only was a Demoocrat, but that in 2013 he proposed the globalist solution to the crash of 2008 when he said, “We will have to leave borders behind and go for global unity when it comes to financial stability.”
These are volatile times, and thus there are other possibilities, but a last minute switch to Trump by the globalists seems the most probable. It is almost as likley that they wanted Trump all along and were playing both us and most of their own front men and all of their useful idiots the whole time in order to give Trump street cred as the anti-globalist candidate. There is perhaps a 1% chance that Trump is backpedaling to deceive the globalists so they don’t do anything extreme to stop him before the electoral college votes and before he takes office. There is even a 1% chance that if we block too many of their moves by outing them ahead of time, then they will trump us by inciting insurrection and blaming it on us, which in the short term could be done through an electoral college surprise or a recount surprise.
Where I think they have miscalculated is that I don’t think they will be able to blame their opponents to the extent they need. In fact, we can derail their plans for years if we wake up enough people so that their attempted misdirection becomes too risky for them. Consider that we derailed their plans for Hillary by making her too much of a liability for them. We thereby forced them to go with their plan B.
The crash will have to come in January 2018 at the earliest to ensure that it is blamed on anti-establishment types and not on Obama. It is possible (30%) that this could be the big one … where the globalists perpetrate a 3 – 12 month collpase, declare martial law, trade bread for guns at FEMA camps, implant RFID chips, force vaccinations, bring in foreign troops, ban cash, collapse the US dollar, and execute a “night of the long knives” to take out likely resistance leaders. Such an extreme move would be pretty risky for them, so I think a lesser crisis is more likely, and if we wake up enough people before then, I suspect their plan B will be a crash more like 2008 with a modest move towards global currency.
A useful word to begin using is collaborator. Top progressives and neocons (Republican progressives) are collaborators.
Consider how Germans began to talk about loyalty in the 1920’s and 30’s. I don’t think this is coincidence. I think the US is being herded into the position of Germany in WWI and WWII.
The globalists see the armed American people as the last thing standing between them and global domination. This includes that minority of the US military still more loyal to the US people than to the government. Therefore, they must take down the American people as soon as they think they can succeed without looking like the bad guys.
I can’t stand to lie
I’m not that naïve
I’m just out to find
The better part of me
I’m more than a turd
I’m more than a bane
More than some big disgrace behind the reign
It’s not easy to be me
Wish that I could cry
Fall upon my knees
Find a way to lie
About the balls I’ll never see
It may sound absurd
But don’t be naïve
Even zeroes have the right to breed
I may be disturbed
But won’t you concede
Even zeroes have the right to dream
It’s not easy to be me
Grow up and just stay
Away from me
It’s not all right
You cannot sleep sound tonight
It’s too crazy
I can’t stand to lie
I’m not that naïve
Men weren’t meant to thrive
Without balls between their knees.
I’m only a man hiding out in DC
Digging for something right on this one way street
Only a man hiding out on E Street
Looking for special things inside of me
It’s not easy to be me.
Many who refuse to vote have been played by the Don’t Vote Psyop.
Consider that I vote even though I don’t need any rulers, which makes me a kind of anarchist – an anarchist who votes – but only for candidates who might effect a net gain in freedom, reality, and quality of life.
I know that democracy is illegitimate.
I know that the Constitution either authorizes the government we have, or has been unable to prevent it.
I know that one vote cannot make a difference.
I know all of this, and still I vote.
I know that the system is rigged so that it has become nearly impossible for good candidates to win or to effect change if they do win.
I know that government schools, mainstream churches, crony corporations, the entire mainstream media, most of the “alternative” media, millions of individuals who depend on government, and millions of other useful idiots …
will fabricate …
will prevent debate …
to prevent good candidates from winning …
to prevent them from effecting change if they do win …
and to prevent them from existing in the first place …
just as there were no capitalist candidates in the USSR.
I know that most good people, at any point, can be turned with bribes and threats.
I know that any good person who is about to effect change, and who cannot be turned, will be killed.
I know all of this, and still I vote.
I know that the perpetrators (the enemies of humanity) and their useful idiots will spout the logical fallacy that if I vote, then I support the system, but of course, it is possible to vote and not support the system – I do it all the time.
Those at the top are just trying to bully me into not voting. Naturally, if you are awake, then they don’t want you to vote, which is why they spread the logically fallacious meme that voting is acceptance of the system. I call this the Don’t Vote Psyop.
I know that the Don’t Vote Psyop makes my vote even less effective, but still I vote.
Most of the people don’t know any of the things I know, but they do know that “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable.” When violent revolution comes, the media will spin it as how so-called rebels chose to fight rather than vote, and they will thus succeed in making those who refused to vote be unfairly viewed as the scourge of humanity. Then, it will be even more difficult to educate others – to put it mildly.
There are other reasons to vote.
Consider that one can write in any name for President. Now consider that if there are no other candidates in any other races who might be a net gain, then not voting for them would make it clear that someone who voted rejected all of those other candidates. That is worth saying. Also, imagine that universally accepted good guy James Corbett (among those who refuse to vote) received one write-in vote. Now imagine that he received one million write-in votes. That would send a message that is worth the effort of saying it.
Sometimes, the correct decision is actually voting for the lesser of two evils, but only if they were even in an accurate poll, and only if there were no third candidate who had any chance of winning. For example, suppose you had access to the results of an accurate poll of every voter in your state, and suppose that Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton got the exact same number of votes in that poll. Now suppose you believed that Donald Trump was clearly the lesser of two evils, and was thus clearly a net gain over Hillary, but you used your weapon (your vote) to vote third party, or suppose you didn’t use you weapon at all, and then Hillary won your state by one vote … and suppose winning your state caused Hillary to win the Presidency … That would make you a pretty douchy person. You would know it, and everyone you know would know it. You would never live it down.
To be clear, voting is the least effective thing I do. It is far more valuable to educate myself and others, but that is also far more time consuming and expensive. I wouldn’t vote if it cost me any more time, money, or other trouble, and I wouldn’t vote if there were no candidates who might effect a net gain. Nor would I fight for the right to vote in such a corrupt. anti-human. illegitimate system because voting is so ineffective, and especially because voting is how the rulers make the people believe that they are free and that their rulers are legitimate. Harriet Tubman said, “I freed a thousand slaves, and I could have freed a thousand more … if only they had known they were slaves.”
Finally, your act of voting will generate good will from others; whereas, not voting is a slap in the face to others. Voting signals to others that you are responsible and peaceful, and it is even an opportunity to educate those at the ballot box who will be more engaged than at any other time.
Anyone who falls for the Don’t Vote Psyop has been played.
Napoleon said …
Every soldier carries a Field Marshal’s baton in his pack.
The opportunity was there.
Anyone could rise from the bottom to the top.
That used to be America.
But America is a corrupt cronyist system.
That’s why America is circling the drain.
Who can rise to the top of a cronyist system?
Only cronies …
Government, corporations, the media …
The top are corrupt cronies.
I know this because I was at the top.
Now I’ve been kicked out of the club.
They’re all on the same side.
Democrats, Republicans …
Bushes, Clintons, Obamas …
They work for the same people.
And they will do anything to maintain their power.
What do they want?
What do they want for you?
They want you powerless and dependent.
Look at what they have done to the black community.
Harriet Tubman said …
I freed a thousand slaves,
and I could have free a thousand more …
If only they had known they were slaves.
I could stop here …
but their propaganda machine won’t let me.
If we’re going to make America great again,
we have to fight back.
We know they’re liars.
They know they’re liars.
They can manufacture many new accusers each day …
if that’s what they think they need.
Which gets us back to how slaves didn’t know they were slaves.
Today … we have elections.
That’s how the people know they’re free. <smirk>
But how can an election be fair …
If the media are all on one side?
If they are playing, good cop – bad cop?
If the media fabricate and censor?
If the corporations fabricate and censor?
Whether you believe we were created …
or the product of evolution …
The leftist, feminist, politically correct agenda …
Goes against our genes.
Such denial …
That’s why violence and racism are worse.
That’s why no one is happy.
That’s why America is cirling the drain.
Women want to get married and have kids.
Men want to get married and have kids.
So, why do the media ridicule what 96% want?
Why do they ridicule what works?
Why do they promote every other arrangement?
But there is also tension.
Men want to impregnate as many women as possible,
And women want to be impregnated with the best genes,
Which are those men who can impregnate the most women.
It should come as no surprise then, what happens …
In the world of politicians, Hollywood, and the rich.
Addiction is rampant …
Because opportunity is rampant.
If you find women irresistable, you can have women.
That may not be a fashionable arrangement anymore,
But that is the least of their crimes …
In a culture addicted to drugs …
In a culture that flies to Pedophile Island …
Lookup the Franklin Scandal.
Many at the top, around the world, are pedophiles.
They think you just don’t understand.
She defended a man she believed had raped a 12 year old girl.
She called the girl a liar.
She laughed about the whole thing.
You can listen to the audio yourself.
But that’s not how she knows so much about it.
She’s married to Bill Clinton.
She not only said his rape victims were liars …
She destroyed them.
Like Bill Clinton …
Like Socrates …
I find women irresistable.
It’s how they look. It’s how they act.
Women were irresistable to me …
when I was younger.
On TV how you look …
How you act …
It’s part of the job description.
It is the job description.
I’m a tall, famous, rich, and powerful alpha male.
That’s the genes women are looking for.
I am irresistable to many women …
especially in that world.
My locker room talk was not fabrication,
but it was exaggeration.
and unlike Bill Clinton …
If women didn’t reciprocate …
I let them be.
You can vote for the kown perpetrator and/or promoter of rape …
Negligence, deceit …
Corruption, cronyism …
Racism, poverty …
Murder, conspiracy …
Dictators, pedophiles …
Terrorism, treason …
War, and genocide …
The perpetrator … to be …
Of a draft …
and of a civil war inducing gun decision from her Supreme Court
You can vote for the Kissing Bandito.
If you want to see the future of the denial that runs America,
Just look at Sweden.
This country of 10 million has one million Muslim immigrants –
Mostly young men – not real refugees.
Sweden also has a 1500% increase in rape,
But if you say it’s the Muslims,
Or if you say they’re not real refugees,
You will go to jail.
America has a choice.
If Americans continue to live in denial …
America will continue to circle the drain.
If Americans are ready to think for themselves,
If Americans are ready to grow up,
we can make America great again.
I, a libertarian, voluntaryist, anarchist, anarcho capitalist, agorist, etc. would vote for Trump if he gave this speech because he might be a significant net gain for freedom, reality, and quality of life; whereas, Hillary, Jill Stein, and Gary Johnson would all be a definite net loss.
Ordinarily I would have voted for the Libertarian Party candidate, Gary Johnson, but he has so clearly sold out that he would simply be a net loss for freedom, reality, and quality of life – one way or another. That’s the whole point of selling out.
Also, the other candidates all seem to be terrified of what people might say about them, which makes it nearly impossible for them to fight effectively; whereas, Trump …
Nevertheless … I would not give money or time to Trump because he only – might – be a net gain. I would only give money or time to a candidate who was a highly probable net gain. For example, I gave money to Gary Johnson in 2012.
Also, I’m not persuaded by the “Don’t Vote“ Psyop. If you are awake, they don’t want you to vote. So, if you don’t vote, then you have been played.
The US has tried for years to beat Al Qaeda, but now, after Americans have given up much freedom to central government and borrowed trillions of dollars from central banks, there is more terrorism than ever before. Nevertheless, don’t blame the FBI or the CIA, or Bush or Obama. There is no shame in being beaten by the best.
Al Qaeda must be at least a generation ahead of the US – both strategically and technologically.
In fact, the only weakness of Al Qaeda is that they keep leaving their passports at the crime scene, but consider that their passports are indestructable. America simply doesn’t have the technology yet to make indestructable passports, so clearly, those Al Qaeda scientists in those caves in Afghanistan are at least a generation ahead of the US. Al Qaeda passports are so tough that they were found on the street after the towers collapsed – unscathed. Maybe this doesn’t sound as scary as it should … until one considers that none of the four black boxes were recovered from the towers. So, America’s most indestructable technology (black boxes) were vaporized under conditions where Al Qaeda passports survived – unscathed. It’s not as if American black boxes are crap either (they have never been completely destroyed before); it’s that Al Qaeda technology is just that good.
What other possible explanation could there be? It’s almost as if …
See what I mean about strategic brilliance? Al Qaeda almost tricked me into considering whether 9/11 could be an inside job, and whether those Al Qaeda scientists in those Afghan caves are not really a generation ahead of the US, but an inside job is clearly impossibe because the CIA is not allowed to operate inside the US.
The evidence for Al Qaeda superiority is overwhelming. Consider that Al Qaeda knocked down three towers with only two planes! No one else could have done that. Two planes hit two towers, and then a third tower (WTC7) collapsed a few hours later. The NIST explained a few years later that it was an ordinary office fire that resulted in what everyone says looks exactly like a controlled demolition, but how is it that only Al Qaeda knew that WTC 7 was the only building in the world that would collapse exactly like a controlled demolition as a result of an ordinary office fire? What’s more, they somehow tricked the owner, Larry Silverstein, and John Kerry too, into claiming years earlier that we brought WTC 7 down as a controlled demolition because it was badly damaged, but how did they trick America’s best into confessing to a conspiracy that never happened? Clearly, they even have some kind of mind control.
I could go on for pages and pages, but there is one hope – Israel. Israel may lag behind Al Qaeda scientists in those Afghan caves, but their strategic brilliance may be as advaned as that of Al Qaeda, so America’s best bet is to give Israel all of our technology, and to borrow trillions more dollars and give them to Israel.
Unfortunately, Al Qaeda has already thought of this, and may have successfully neutralized Israel when it tricked several Mossad agents into setting up cameras ahead of time on 9/11 and dancing with joy when the towers collapsed. Even if Al Qaeda’s preemptive move has made it politically impossible to give everything to Israel, at least Israel is our strongest ally in the region and is thus far more important than before 9/11 …
Don’t believe anything the media, the government, the Vatican, or even any supposedly alternative source, like Alex Jones, tells you about aliens if their story could in any way further the agenda of the most powerful people in the world. Instead, think for yourself about what real aliens would do, what they would be able to do, and what they would believe. Also, think about what kind of extraordinary evidence would be necessary to prove the extraordinary claim that an actual alien invasion is a more likely explanation than a human conspiracy.
The agenda of the most powerful people in the world is: one world government, one world currency, one world religion, no armed citizens, total dependence on government, and total control over individuals. Let’s refer to these totalitarians as ”the globalists”. Some specific uses for such power by the globalists would be to reduce population in order to sanitize the human gene pool and to preserve what they see as their resources.
Almost any kind of alien hoax would further the globalist agenda. An alien invasion would be the most effective hoax because a majority would be willing to make unlimited sacrifices for survival, and they would comply with even the most extreme national security measures. They would also demand global government.
The second most useful alien hoax would be a putatively peaceful visit that bestowed the gifts of more advanced government and more advanced spiritually. Of course, those gifts would be global government, global currency, and global religion, and no potential for some crazy citizen to do any harm to others. Such a “peaceful” alien hoax would also promise additional gifts of technology, once we had “progressed” to the point where no crazy citizen would have the freedom to use that technology to hurt anyone.
Although most useful idiots would be more likely to believe, and thus more willing to kill, for the invasion story, nearly as many would be just as extreme for the “good alien” story. For example, can you imagine what the crowds of useful idiots would do to any critic of the globalist agenda when the media, the politicians, and the mega churches told them how such critics were holding us back from receiving the additional gifts of alien technology?!
The globalists wouldn’t even have to fight their own fight. One can see how easily they could manipulate hundreds of millions, maybe billions, of useful idiots to fight for their agenda.
I first learned about the idea of an alien hoax to further the globalist agenda from Bill Cooper, which wouldn’t mean anything … except … he was the guy who accurately predicted that something like 9/11 would happen about when it did and that it would be blamed on Osama bin Laden. Of course, we now know that 9/11 was definitely conspiracy. He didn’t have time to develop all the details of an alien hoax that I layout here because they killed him about a month after 9/11.
One might assume the globalists would pull it off just as soon as they believed they could get away with it, but as long as their agenda were progressing, they wouldn’t waste their best false flag unless they saw a window of opportunity closing. For example, what if those internet bloggers started waking up too many people, or what if known technology were catching up to secret technology to such an extent that the hoax would soon become less convincing?
Given that the Vatican has already started preparing people to expect the “peaceful” alien hoax, and given that it would be easier to pull off, I expect it to happen before the invasion hoax, and probably in the 2 – 10 year time frame.
Suppose enough people were not convinced by the “peaceful” alien hoax. In that case, the globalists would have the “peaceful aliens” launch a limited attack to punish a few of those cities having the most non-believers. If that still wasn’t enough, the globalists could have another fake alien race try to exterminate us for being so uncooperative, but then the “peaceful” aliens who had already punished a few non-believing cities could claim that we were worth saving and defeat the bad aliens in a spectacular light show in the sky. Imagine how grateful everyone would be. Then, surely, enough people would be on board for the globalist agenda.
Suppose the bad aliens used some beams from space to destroy ground targets. Would you believe it? Consider that governments have been working on such weapons for decades.
Real aliens wouldn’t exterminate us by physically attacking us. They would simply create a virus that would kill us. Therefore, the globalists might choose to use a virus, which again is plausible human technology, and claim that they got the vaccine from the good aliens. Of course, the vaccine would also be a eugenics program, and its ill effects would simply be blamed on the original virus, when they were in fact caused by the vaccine.
If there were a real alien involved, consider that he may simply be a passive observer and not one of the perpetrators. Also, consider than one alien is not proof of an invasion. It would be more likely that he were a captured scout and that his technology were being used against his will. At least, any of those scenarios is far more likely than an alien invasion that just happened to occur at the point where the globalists had achieved the ability and the need to pull off such a hoax.