The Players Are Guilty Of Every Conceivable Atrocity … Except …

Whenever the players (e.g. those who control the CIA) have a motive, what's stopping them from perpetrating any conceivable crime, assassination, spying, psyop, or false flag?

The players are above the law—globally, control the global media, and have nearly limitless means, so when they have a motive, what could be stopping them?

The players are psychopaths, who thus have no conscience, so that's not a reason that any rational well-informed person would assume is stopping them.

The only reason to ever assume the players have not perpetrated any conceivable crime, assassination, spying, psyop, or false flag ... for which they have motive ... is if it would threaten the illusion of legitimacy. Without the illusion of legitimacy, the whole system that empowers them would collapse.

The illusion of legitimacy is the belief that the government has a right to do whatever it is doing because it represents the will of the people, and that the will of the people is sufficient to make it legitimate. Of course, the will of the people is not sufficient to make government legitimate (democracy is not legitimate), so it is also necessary for the players to maintain the illusion that democracy is legitimate while maintaining the illusion that government does indeed represent the will of the people (that democracy is not just some facade masking how the system really works).

In other words, the only reason any rational and well-informed person would ever assume the players have not perpetrated any conceivable crime, assassination, spying, psyop, or false flag ... for which they have motive ... is if it might cause the people to conclude that the system doesn't work like they think it does. As long as the players can make the results of their actions look natural to the same majority, or look like the work of some scapegoat, then there is really nothing stopping them.

Consider that if the players had continued with their original plan to install Hillary, then they could have destroyed the illusion of legitimacy. It looks like they figured this out about ten days before the election, which is why it looks like the players decided to go with their plan B (Trump).

The players still have to care about what the majority thinks because they have not developed sufficient slave technology, such as drones, robotics, and AI ... yet ... Once they have sufficient technology, they will not care what the majority thinks, and more importantly, they will not care if the majority lives.