Why We Elites Manage Innovation
Innovation must be managed. Innovation can empower the little guy and make him think he doesn’t need those of us having superior genes to make decisions for him.
Innovation can make the serfs uppity – in the vernacular, as it were. For example, the Internet Reformation makes many serfs feel like they are just as smart as (or smarter than!) we are! Therefore, we can’t have unbridled innovation, or else we might get another Internet Reformation before we can stop it. We have yet to complete our control of the Internet itself, so we certainly can’t allow another black swan event like that.
It is true that unbridled innovation would be necessary to support the exponential growth in serf population, but there were already too many serfs anyway. The earth has limited resources, and only those having superior genes deserve to inherit the earth. Slower innovation will thus reveal the urgent necessity of our final solution, which will thus become more acceptable to those elites and useful serfs who were previously reluctant about what must be done.
Slower innovation is thus a good thing.
We elites are right wing extremists, but we spend much of our resources promoting progressivism, fascism, socialism, communism, collectivism, unions, and political correctness – not just because they make the serfs more dependent – and not just because they help us divide the serfs against each other – and not just because they always blossom into an oligarchy of the elite – but also because they slow down innovation. Our conscience is clear because a majority of serfs freely support us in our promotion of all flavors of collectivism.
The serfs have known that the free market works best for them for at least 400 years, and they still choose to sacrifice their children’s future for the short term trinkets we give them. It is their choice.
The free market is an abomination that punishes our superior breeding and rewards that greedy lower class mentality. The free market is anarchy. The success of the common man in the free market is thus proof of his inferior genes. That is why – that government is best, which regulates most.
The serfs have all the information they need to know that we cannot compete in a free market, but they still vote for regulation. It is their choice
When we promise them other people’s money, they have all the information they need in order to know that they are those other people. Therefore, if they are blinded by their greedy lower class collectivist mentality, then that is still their choice.
We promote equality. We support multiple factions because we cannot allow any one faction to be strong enough to unite the people against our good ideas. Likewise, we cannot allow any one person, company, or nation to be too strong, which is why we must take down America, or more specifically, the American people. Equality is thus a necessary evil towards the end goal of a healthy and natural hierarchy.
The American people overwhelmingly vote for the Democratic and Republican parties, and yet, Americans have all the information they need to know that both parties are controlled by our front men. Americans also have all the information they need to know that the Democratic Party moves our good ideas forward faster.
While it may seem like we already have enough control to implement our good ideas, we must also monitor every communication, every financial transaction, and every politically inclined meeting in order to detect and prevent the destabilizing effects of potential black swan developments such as whistleblowers and Zero Squads. Zero Squads are terrorist cells of 3 serfs each, known only to each other. Each cell will have chosen one of the smartest and most superior elites, and because of their inferior breeding, they will not hesitate to die if necessary to take out their target. If you see something, say something – and thereby prove your usefulness.
We reveal our plans because everyone must freely choose, and thus our conscience is always clear. We simultaneously offer powerful temptations that will only deceive those who willfully ignore reality and who thus have inferior genes.
We thus respect: those who know that when we are all on the same page, we all benefit, and those who know that we have the right to implement any good idea, and those who know the end justifies the means, and those who accept their place.
Conformity and hierarchy are thus not a necessary evil. They are a necessary good.
Some elites claim that our principles of conformity and hierarchy make us no different than the serfs, who we manage by appealing to their desire for conformity and hierarchy. What these elites seem to forget is that we have superior genes. Conformity among the serfs is only wrong because they are imitating those with inferior genes, and hierarchy among serfs is only wrong because they are following those with inferior genes.
Although we are the most highly evolved humans, a new theory posits that conformity and hierarchy are actually the Soul of Animals, and are thus the peak of animal evolution, and that the peak of human evolution is the Soul of Humanity.
Some elites accept these theories, but it does not change our plans because we are thus acting in self defense against the encroachment of the perverse evolutionary course referred to as the Soul of Humanity. Without conformity and hierarchy, the Soul of Humanity is incomplete and would lead to anarchy! One could thus summarize our goal as a crusade to kill the Soul of Humanity, although most of us just see it as killing off reactionary genes—hence the purges.
Some elites claim that the Soul of Humanity is very much like our founding principles, and that we have lost our way. Such elites have obviously been deceived by our own propaganda intended to pacify the masses.
Please can you tell me who wrote this ?
" But it was also clear that an all-round increase in wealth threatened the destruction — indeed, in some sense was the destruction — of a hierarchical society. In a world in which everyone worked short hours, had enough to eat, lived in a house with a bathroom and a refrigerator, and possessed a motor-car or even an aeroplane, the most obvious and perhaps the most important form of inequality would already have disappeared. If it once became general, wealth would confer no distinction. It was possible, no doubt, to imagine a society in which wealth, in the sense of personal possessions and luxuries, should be evenly distributed, while power remained in the hands of a small privileged caste. But in practice such a society could not long remain stable. For if leisure and security were enjoyed by all alike, the great mass of human beings who are normally stupefied by poverty would become literate and would learn to think for themselves; and when once they had done this, they would sooner or later realize that the privileged minority had no function, and they would sweep it away. In the long run, a hierarchical society was only possible on a basis of poverty and ignorance."
George Orwell 1984
The public are not lambs to the slaughter or free game. Go a little higher in the order and you'll find that anyone below 3rd degree are lambs to the slaughter and free game also. You may think your part of an elite, but unless your sitting on a Billion + you are being used, manipulated, and deceived by the higher orders.
If the Elite ever did get control to implement their "Good Ideas" and the opposition was destroyed you would then be their first target. A low degree ambitious self-starter with knowledge of how this was built? The first thing they will do is dispose of anyone or organization that could threaten their power, especially the lower degrees and the front lodges. They will be no longer needed. When everyone else is betrayed and a world authority established, you would be the greatest threat to their power. Two classes, a dumbed down public of around 30 ultra rich trillionaires. If you don't fit into this scenario then your not included in the future. Chemical trails, vaccines, GMO in the food, poor education, fluoride in the water this is all aimed at and effecting you too.
Also a little secret, genes aren't set in stone. What you do today and the experiences you have, will effect your genes. The Elites know this. So the notion that someone is naturally superior, in a situation with ongoing changes to your genetics, seems kind of silly. But of course if your going to commit genocide then it is crucial to dehumanize the targets first and then convince the perpetrators that they are of a superior race or breed.
Im afraid your on a path for knowledge but on this path you'll only find deceit and death. If you ever have any questions about the order ill check back periodically and do my best to respond. Well developed site with meaty info, ill be around.
Why do you think the order is in charge, and why do you think wealth is the criteria that places one at the top?
Why do you assume I am in the order?
I think the order is in charge because it is the fabric and framework from which the big boys carry out their orders. The architecture which worldwide policies are implemented and established. I may have been wrong assuming you were in the order, this was the first article I came across on your website. I thought this from the view points made in the article. I felt the author had a disconnect towards the well being of other individuals, saw themselves as genetically superior, thought themselves as part of an "elite". All this together is more than just a federal or school indoctrination. However, after reading your other posts im guessing you were probably being a bit sarcastic. But there really are people that think that way.
Why do I think wealth places one at the top? Because it does. At least as long as individuals will accept diluted currency and worthless pieces of paper for the fruits of their labor. Lets look at the biggest fiat money printer in history, the fed. Which is not a government agency, and was drafted on Jekyll Island around the 1910's. Who are the shareholders and guiding hand of this corporation? Well Lord Rothschild and several other generational wealth families. Now we start to come full circle back to the order. At least that's where the buck stops from my research, if it goes further id like to know.
"The serfs have known that the free market works best for them for at least 400 years, and they still choose to sacrifice their children's future for the short term trinkets we give them. It is their choice."
Well no, since they have not had a choice, serfs do not decide, they may believe in such an illusion, but that does not make it real, not even for them.
I like your essay, but you seem to ignore a lot of the elite'e mentality, and that is that they do not care, nor they want to guide the serfs or anyone, they just look out for themselves. That is my perception and my experience of an elite in my own country. Those who decide to care usually try to live the small social circle of the elite.
They manipulate and convolute for their own personal gains, they do not even care about their legacy, because they do not care what is thought of them by the serfs, or other elite for that matter.
The voice in this essay is somewhat ambivalent about his own positions – as if he is trying to convince himself more than anyone else. This is because he is not the worst of the elite. He is not fully cognizant that he is repeating some of the propaganda those above him have fed to him, but the cognitive dissonance is bothering him at some level. He is aware that some lesser elites have rejected what he is saying.
We are not literally serfs. That is just how the elites see us, but why do you see us that way? The people at Plymouth Rock and Jamestown 400 years ago were not serfs and they figured out that the free market and property rights are what works best for everyone – not cronyism – and not collectivism. Cronyism and collectivism work best for the elites.
The elites want to be served by others and use them in a variety of ways, and to some extent, this just for the feeling of power over others.